Will Russian enterprises have enough power, success and prosperity to keep a stable democratic government in place? There is a possibility that the large majority of the population, who believe political pluralism is not important, may be right.
Levada believes that this is a major problem. In a true democracy, pluralism is vital and allows for various branches of government to, "Cooperate while remaining separate from one another" Levada 5, Levada describes Russia as a "Managed Democracy," in which President Vladimir Putin controls the government and has illegitimately swayed the opinion of the Russian people.
According to LevadaPresident Putin has created a "Managed Democracy" and is now controlling every facet of the government while masquerading an elaborate show of government reform.
McFaul and Petrov explain that although the recent elections in Russia demonstrate a thoroughly institutionalized system, the incumbent President, Vladimir Putin, had an unfair advantage over his opponents.
These concerns can be substantiated through analysis of many articles on the subject of Russian Democracy. This in turn, according to Sestanovich may allow for a power change and an increase in pluralism.
The current Russian Democratic system may well be what is best for Russia under the conditions Furthermore, Levada seems to view citizens through the eyes of Plato and does not trust in their opinion.
This allows for the safeguards of rights and liberties established in a Democratic System. Few have an optimistic outlook for democratic prosperity in Russia.
However, if the Russian economy fails, the Russian people may loose confidence in democracy and turn back to communism for a quick fix. Was it truly a diabolical plan crafted by Putin to crush his opposition that enabled him to win the last election? There may not be enough clear evidence to support the assertion that Russian citizens are clearly misinformed.
One of his main arguments is that the Russian economy may encounter a major pitfall in the near future, causing business leaders to revolt against Putin and his United Party.
Thus, Lavada believes that the Russian people support Putin without fully understanding the consequences.
Levada describes the Russian form of government as lacking a pluralistic system, so that various branches of the current government are controlled by whoever sits atop a hierarchical pyramid of bureaucracy.
Levada argues that the overwhelming power of the United Party has all but completely destroyed the chances of a true democracy in Russia. Or, do the Russian people believe in Putin because he is simply a strong leader who has improved the Russian government and economy?
However, it is felt that Putin can no longer afford to rely on this singular power base and must now restore pluralism to the government or face backlash from economic leaders.
Sestanovich states that hundreds of companies, "have already begun to mobilize in support of the creation, for the first time, of true capitol markets" Sestanovich 3, Authors Michael McFaul and Nikolai Petrov explain in their article, What the Elections Tell Us, that although the electoral system in Russia is stable and institutionalized, recent elections have had little meaning and therefore do not demonstrate a legitimate democracy.
In yet another article entitled, Force, Money, and Pluralism, written by Stephen Sestanovichthe author does not focus on the failings of the Russian democracy, but rather, he concentrates on how Russian businesses and corporate institutions can affect the ultimate outcome of the post-soviet democratization process.
Sestanovich explains that President Putin created a centralized state bureaucracy in an effort to improve the development and growth of the Russian economy and government. Russian Democracy has evolved differently than other western democracies have.
Putin has brought economic prosperity to Russia and has brought about relative stability there. LevadaMcFaul, Petrov and Sestanovich have similar viewpoints on the future of democracy in Russia.Analysis Interpretation of the news based including not just the United States but also elections in Ukraine and France and Russia combines such cyber operations with propaganda to amplify.
Russian interference in the United States elections. Jump to navigation Jump to search. ODNI "Putin's Asymmetric Assault on Democracy in Russia and Europe: Implications for U.S. National Security." The intelligence analysis would cover malicious cyberwarfare occurring between the and elections.
the state of democracy in russia The most recent presidential and parliamentary elections in Russia have sparked heated debate concerning the future of Russian democracy. Many social scientists and Russian politician's say that hopes for a true Russian democratic system have been crushed.4/4(1).
An Analysis Of Liberal Democracy In Russia Politics Essay. Print Reference this. There is opposition to ‘United Russia’ party, where the leader is Putin, Liberal Democratic Party of Russia with its leader-Zhirinovsky.
Nowadays Liberal Democratic Party of Russia has very different values and ideology. It has more nationalistic. People who live in countries where the political system is less than “fully democratic” tend to give Beijing and Moscow higher marks for upholding individual rights than people who live in full democracies, according to a new Pew Research Center analysis of public opinion in 38 countries across the globe.
Jan 17, · Analysis: Democracy in decline, Trump not helping by the United States to lead democracies in effectively confronting the growing threat from Russia and China, and from the other states .Download